Random Asides

Intersex Man, 66, Suffers Bigotry by the Media

Also published on Queereka.

I got a link today to an article from the South China Morning Post about an intersex man. The story is interesting, but the article itself is horrible. They are completely ignorant of intersex people, and as an extension, gender non-conforming people in general.

The title goes: “Man, 66, goes to doctor and finds he’s a woman”

Yeah, well, that is in fact impossible. A correct title would be: “Man, 66, goes to doctor and finds he has a rare medical condition.” It doesn’t have the same sensationalist ring to it, but at least it is accurate and does not reek of cissexism.

Reading through the article it is clear the man has two relatively rare conditions.

Firstly there’s Turner syndrome, which is when a person is partially or entirely missing one sex chromosome. Meaning they have one X chromosome and that’s pretty much it. Most foetuses with this condition are spontaneously aborted, but some are born alive. The condition occurs in 1 in 2000 to 5000 “phenotypic females”.

Secondly, he has a condition called congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). It is a condition that can cause an overproduction of androgens, male sex hormones, and can cause ambiguous genitalia and masculinisation in people without a Y chromosome. It varies greatly how common the condition is based on race, but it ranges from 1 in 280 to 1 in 15000. There is a condition that affects people with a Y chromosome in a similar way too, androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), where one is fully or partially immune to androgens. The effect of this is full or partial feminisation.

Anyway, so back to the article.

About his condition, the article says:

Sufferers [of Turner syndrome] usually look like women, but in this case the patient also had congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), which boosted the male hormones and made the patient look like a man.

This an instance of the “not really a man/woman” trope that leads to the “fake man/woman” accusation trans people often face. We (I’m a trans woman) only look male or female. But we aren’t really you see. It’s all fake. … This is a pretty common form of bigotry we face. Especially in the media. There are numerous medical conditions that can cause a person to lack one or more of the features usually associated with a given gender. People will often then try to erase someone’s gender identity based on it. Especially if you’re a woman, as we saw with Angelina Jolie who recently among numerous sexist and racist remarks had her identity as a woman erased for having had a double mastectomy.

In the case of the Chinese article they also ignore this man’s own wishes and identity as “he has decided to continue perceiving himself as a male and may receive male hormone treatment.” This clearly implies that he has always seen himself as a man, and continues to do so. Of course he is a man. However the article, while quoting the Hong Kong Medical Journal, presumably, says:

The patient, by definition, is a woman who cannot get pregnant. But she also has CAH, which gave her the appearance of a man,” Chinese University paediatrics professor Ellis Hon Kam-lun said. “It’s an interesting and very rare case of having the two combinations. It probably won’t be seen again in the near future.

Seriously? By definition? Sorry, ignorant medical peoples. There is no clear definition of man and woman, as is clearly evident by the range of intersex variations in humans and other animals. Man/woman and male/female are false dichotomies, an artificial binary that is used also in medicine because it is statistically dominant and to an extent practical. However it isn’t that simple in reality. As any other group classification in nature it is a simplistic representation. The problem arises when simplistic representations of nature become so ingrained in the culture that we try to enforce them. Something conservatives and religious people are exceedingly good at.

The medical profession is also guilty of enforcing this binary representation on new born intersex babies, resulting in genital mutilations and life long sexual dysfunction. This is still practised many places. In her book Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality (2000), professor Anne Fausto-Sterling discusses, among other things, the biology behind intersex and the treatment of intersex people throughout medical history. It is an excellent book if you are interested in the topic, but it also makes you sad and angry. Another tragic case of confused doctors messing with people’s identity in the name of the holy binary and failed gender theories is the case of David Reiner who accidentally lost his penis during a circumcision and was surgically assigned female. He eventually took his own life.

Just to throw in a last insult at intersex and trans people, with a touch of ableism (several of the conditions can cause disabilities), they just had to add this line:

Normal females have a pair of X chromosomes, while males have one X and one Y.

So, normal females have XX and males have XY? Well, gee, if bigots like this person are the normals, I don’t want to be. May I suggest that you, anonymous “staff reporter”, writer of the article, go fuck yourself — and then perhaps go educate yourself a bit.

Feature image: photo by Nora Tam

Veronica

Veronica

Veronica is a PhD candidate in high energy physics at the University of Oslo, Norway. She loves science, and is a total science-fiction nerd. She's a queer feminist, a secular humanist, and of course a skeptic. She spends most of her free time working for one of the major LGBTQ+ organisations in Norway. She is the editor of the Norwegian Skepchick blog, but also writes for some of the other blogs in the network. She can be found on Twitter as @VeronicaInPink.

Previous post

Skepchick Quickies 6.6

Next post

AI: Get Real

5 Comments

  1. June 6, 2013 at 11:18 am —

    Good article, Veronica!

    I’m thinking it’s going to take some Chinese intersex and trans activism to begin to change that kind of thinking, like it did here in the US. Though it’s still quite prevalent here, mainly because (I would argue) that we base our understandings of bodies (sex/gender/sexuality) in biomedical/bioreductivist understandings that tell us that bodies (sex in particular) are immutable. It’s also going to take changing the ways biomedicine views bodies (Fausto-Sterling gets at this in her book) to make room for biocultural models.

    I also recommend the book Fixing Sex by Katrina Karkazis for a deeper understanding of the experiences of intersex people in medicine.

    • June 6, 2013 at 12:16 pm —

      Ah, thanks for reminding me. I need to get that book :)

    • June 6, 2013 at 8:23 pm —

      I have relatives in china and have spent roughly 8 months of my life there in total, and I’d have to say that any fairness for trans people there is a severely uphill battle :(. As to why, well that’s an hourlong conversation at least….

  2. June 7, 2013 at 1:54 am —

    From what I know of the prevailing attitudes towards sex and gender in even relatively open and progressive Hong Kong (where I live), this isn’t surprising. Still, I’m curious how the quotes render in the (presumably) original Cantonese/Chinese, which is a language that, among other things, has no gendered pronouns.

  3. May 3, 2015 at 8:01 am —

    As a real, naturally occuring intersexed person growing up with daily discrimination and harassment even within my own family, I know full well just how terribly hard it is to live as we have to often hide and stay out of sight.

    We are now days even mis-labeled transgender, which is bad for us because we have a whole gamut of health issues which transgender people do not have.

    This world is geared to eliminate us by any means possible, so it is hard to survive, but I write romance novels [not porn] in where the heroines or their love interests are intersexed.

Leave a reply