“The Rock” Fights a Tsunami in “San Andreas” but Could It Happen?

Support more videos like this at patreon.com/rebecca!

Sorta transcript:

I have a confession to make: I love disaster porn. I don’t mean actual porn where the boom mic is visible…I mean terrible movies with huge death tolls. I loved The Day After Tomorrow, and 2012, and Volcano, and Dante’s Inferno, and Armageddon, and Deep Impact, which again is not actual pornography despite the name.

So I’m very excited for The Rock’s new movie, San Andreas, which promises to show the obliteration of the West Coast, which I currently call home. We’ve actually had a few rumbles in the past couple of days, which may just be ingenious viral marketing for the movie, I’m not sure.

As much as I love the cheesy acting and the brilliant special effects of most disaster porn, I think my favorite part is always the bad science. And judging from the trailer, it looks like San Andreas will not disappoint on that front.

First of all, according to the film’s official website, the earthquake that destroys California in the film is a magnitude 9.0. According to geologists, the maximum magnitude of the San Andreas fault is 8.1. That may not sound like much of a difference, but the magnitude scale is logarithmic, meaning that the 9.0 earthquake is 8 times bigger than the 8.1 earthquake and 22 times stronger.

Second of all, would a large San Andreas fault earthquake cause a tsunami to destroy San Francisco?

Probably not, no. That tsunami in the trailer for San Andreas looks impressive, but unless it was caused by a different earthquake or maybe an asteroid coincidentally landing in the ocean just after the San Andreas earthquake, it’s probably not very realistic.

The reason has to do with what kind of fault the San Andreas is: transform. Transform faults occur when two tectonic plates are moving horizontally past one another: in this case, you can picture what’s happening by thinking of how San Francisco, which is on the North American plate, is slowly getting closer to Los Angeles, which is on the Pacific plate. How nice! I have a lot of friends in LA.

The types of earthquakes that can result in tsunamis occur at convergent faults, meaning that the two plates are running into each other. When one plate is oceanic and the other is land, the oceanic one is heavier, causing it to go under the other plate, which is called “subduction.” That causes it to pop up in other places and displace a whole lot of water. That water then moves toward the land and becomes a tsunami.

That doesn’t mean that California can’t experience a tsunami. The Gorda plate, up by the Pacific Northwest, does form a convergent fault with the North American plate, resulting in subduction zone that has sent waves to Northern California and Oregon. The biggest tsunami to hit the west coast in modern times happened in 1964, when an earthquake in Alaska caused a tsunami to travel down the coast, killing dozens of people. The worst hit town was Crescent City in northern California, where the harbor acts as a sort of tsunami focuser. That town actually gets loads of tsunamis, though usually they aren’t the devastating kind that we’re all so familiar with.

Anyway, I’m not sure how the film will explain their tsunami, but I won’t be holding my breath waiting for a rational explanation other than “it’s a disaster film on the West Coast so we basically have to destroy the Golden Gate Bridge in a fun way or people will be horribly disappointed.” But good luck to those people in the trailer who take cover from the wave hurling a cruise ship at their high-rise by hiding behind a pillar. They’re going to need it.

Rebecca Watson

Rebecca is a writer, speaker, YouTube personality, and unrepentant science nerd. In addition to founding and continuing to run Skepchick, she hosts Quiz-o-Tron, a monthly science-themed quiz show and podcast that pits comedians against nerds. There is an asteroid named in her honor. Twitter @rebeccawatson Mastodon mstdn.social/@rebeccawatson Instagram @actuallyrebeccawatson TikTok @actuallyrebeccawatson YouTube @rebeccawatson BlueSky @rebeccawatson.bsky.social

Related Articles


  1. I loved Volcano especially. A volcano erupts through the La Brea Tar Pits (translation, the the tar tar pits)? The Tar Pits aren’t volcanic–they’re just tar deposits! Plus, there are lots of goodies in that film for us Angelenos. Lava flowing down Wilshire–yummy!

  2. I think you mean “Dante’s Peak” rather than “Dante’s Inferno.” There is a Dante’s Inferno movie, but at a quick glance at IMDB, it doesn’t look to be disaster porn.

    “Dante’s Peak” is interesting in that (I am led to believe) it has very high (for Hollywood) scientific accuracy. Not only are all the events depicted possible, they are even all possible on the same type of volcano. (Although it stretches credibility for them all to happen in one eruptive event.) And frankly, a pyroclastic flow is the most terrifying natural phenomenon I know of. It is unavoidable certain* death and total destruction that you can hopelessly watch approach.

    (* certain outside of Hollywood.)

    I remember that pre-release, “Deep Impact” made a big song and dance about how much attention they’d paid to scientific accuracy, consulting with many astronomers. Having seen the movie, I shudder to think how (scientifically) bad it must have been *before* those consultations, if they greatly improved it.

    1. For scientific (in)accuracy, nothing could be as bad as Armageddon or The Core. The latter actually had to invent a disaster to star in it. (Something about the Earth’s core no longer moving and that screwing with the electromagnetic field. It was all gobbledygook.)

      1. I haven’t seen Armageddon, but it probably answers my question “How bad could Deep Impact have been without scientific consultation?”

      2. If you want to see compter geeks get apoplectic, mention the computer virus destroying the alien computer in “Independence Day.” But how can it be compatible with a alien computer?! Maybe Microsoft, Apple, and Google have expanded their markets….

  3. I didn’t know that about “Dante’s Peak,” Filias. I’ve enjoyed that one, too, though perhaps its relative plausibility is the reason why it’s a bit less disaster porn-yummy. The fact that many elements of the plot flow from the type of volcano it is suggests to me, as a writer, that the screenwriter did his or own research before writing it. I’ve found that research can be a font of ideas, driving the plot. I’ve sometimes continued reading about a subject even when I have all the information I needed for this reason. When I was writing a short story satirizing New Age “philosophy,” my research was also a continuing inspiration for the humor.

    Volcano, on the other hand, was a bubbling stew pot, where everyone threw in a little something. Hey, wouldn’t it be cool if we sent lava down Wilshire Blvd? If the had used the 405 freeway, at least something would finally be moving down it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button