Not All Cops.

Yesterday a grand jury decided that the only person indicted in the killing of Eric Garner, an unarmed Black man choked to death in broad daylight in New York City, would be the person who filmed his death.

This morning the St. Louis Police Department posted a social media update titled “Kids will be kids?” I hoped, for one fleeting moment, that they were taking a departure from their usual “don’t question police decisions” stance to address the fact that yet another recent unarmed Black victim of police brutality, Tamir Rice of Cleveland, was only 12 years old. To perhaps address the fact that this could have been prevented, that change must happen soon. Or maybe just to express sympathy to the parents of Black children who have been killed this year for crimes White children do not typically associate with arrest, let alone the death penalty.

How silly of me. They were cautioning parents against allowing their children access to toy guns.

They were cautioning parents against ending up like the parents of Tamir Rice.

They’ve since apologized, assuring the public that they do indeed use “discernment” about the value of human life. I’d submit that it’s that “discernment,” rather than any lack thereof, that is the problem.

For White Americans like me, the last few months have shone a brutal and unforgiving light upon the roaches and festering scars of our country: as my father pointed out to me in a recent email, the system is working exactly the way it was designed to work. Protecting White comfort and sense of tribalistic safety at the frivolous expenditure of Black and Brown lives––that is the true goal of our justice system. Everything else is just for show.

In feminist circles, we frequently lament the tendency of men to respond to our stories of harassment, discrimination, sexual assault, and everyday sexism with the words we’ve come to simultaneously mock and dread: “Not all men!”

They think they’re saying, “Don’t paint us all with the same brush. Some of us don’t deserve your anger.”

But the message on the other end of the phone sounds something more like, “Instead of working with you to address this problem, my immediate concern is discrediting you to ensure my own reputation is preserved.”

And true to form as oppressors, the American police have responded to months of protest and demands for accountability with a resounding, single voice: Not all cops.

If that were true, why don’t we see police joining in the rallies and chanting along with us that “Black lives matter?” Do they not believe that’s true, or just that their reputations matter more?

Why don’t we see cops turning in the “bad cops” among them––calling each other out for brutality, uniting to build a humane and socially conscious force, agreeing to work toward the level of service and protection they claim to hold so dear?

Why don’t we see cops campaigning along with the most marginalized of us for better practices, more oversight, more accountability––changes that would improve not only their ranks but their safety, since that is so paramount that they frequently kill unarmed “threats” to protect it?

The narrative they’ve chosen to uphold, however, is Not All Cops. And that’s our answer: until it truly is all cops exhibiting militarized, racist, and brutal behavior, they will not feel obligated to address criticism. So, by their logic, we must wait until that’s the case.

And with every grand jury decision, every senseless death, every questionable police action with no respect for the concept of transparency, that frightening image seems closer to reality.

Featured image: Scott Olson/Getty Images

Julia Burke

Julia is a wine educator with an interest in labor and politics in the wine industry. She has also written about fitness and exercise science, mental health, beer, and a variety of other topics for Skepchick. She has been known to drink Amaro Montenegro with PB&J.

Related Articles


  1. I think the situation is even worse than you are suggesting here. I am less and less convinced that any significant number of police disagree with the tactics in the first place.

    1. I’ll be interviewing several in the coming days for a separate project, and I suspect I know what I’ll hear: cops are put in dangerous situations and must feel they can protect themselves. The system requires change on so many levels––training, racial diversity, follow-up after incidents that suggest officers are unfit for duty, laws on the books forcing more accountability, gun reform.

      I think any police that do disagree with the tactics fear undermining their ability to protect themselves, as well as their united front, by saying so. But their perspective could be so valuable to this widespread reform that I believe is needed.

  2. I agree that the argument of ‘not all cops’ in the face of such tragedy is absurd. It is a little like saying well it wasn’t me. The part that is so irritating is that there are those in law enforcement that just don’t get it. The jig is up, the American public is disgusted and wants better in its communities. There is a reason that their is distrust there. There was mistrust well before the recording in New York. The abuse of power is just so bad now that people are united and willing to do something about it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button