Skepticism

Quickies: The Broken Criminal Justice System, Catcalling, and Sexism in Hollywood

  • Before the Law – “A boy was accused of taking a backpack. The courts took the next three years of his life.”
  • The Daily Show Has Finally Solved Catcalling – “You might be surprised at what that camera caught… if you are a man who stubbornly refuses to listen when the women in his life complain about the invasive barrage their daily commute can become. Otherwise, not so much. Great news, though: Williams has found a couple of solutions, which include prancing down the street while singing ‘You’re a Grand Old Flag.’ “
  • The Herculean Effort Taken By One Group To Show Hollywood Is Sexist – “Every year, Smith compiles the single-most comprehensive set of statistics about women and minorities in film — in front of and behind the camera — through a rigorous and borderline masochistic process. She and her team are trying to do the impossible: convince gatekeepers that women are people, too, and should probably, you know, be in movies.” From Arturo.
  • The Leftovers – “Sure, Paula Deen’s mainstream career is over. But now she has her very own digital network—uncensored, y’all—and she’s making millions in a booming new sector: the martyrdom industrial complex.”
  • Prison bankers cash in on captive customers – “Eddie needs money to pay for basic needs like toothpaste, visits to the doctor and winter clothes. In some states families of inmates pay for toilet paper, electricity, even room and board, as governments increasingly shift the costs of imprisonment from taxpayers to the families of inmates. ‘To give him $50, I have to send $70 off my card,’ says Taylor, who moved to a smaller apartment on the outskirts of Johnson City in part because of the rising cost of supporting Eddie. ‘They’re punishing the families, not the inmates.’ “
  • Cat Watch 2014: What’s it like being a cat? – Cats are at a crucial point in their evolutionary journey as they transform from solitary hunters to domestic pets, a study by the BBC and the Royal Veterinary College has revealed.

Featured Image

Mary

Mary Brock works as an Immunology scientist by day and takes care of a pink-loving princess child by night. She likes cloudy days, crafting, cooking, and Fall weather in New England.

Related Articles

5 Comments

  1. The Kalief Browder case is an outrage on many levels. As far as I can tell, it was never more than one person’s word against another’s. They never found the stolen property nor any other evidence. Why didn’t his attorney get the case thrown out? Why did prosecutors keep pursuing such a weak case? Why did the judges let the case proceed?

    I suspect the answer:
    Prosecutors know they almost always cave and take a plea deal eventually. Keep them in jail and they will give up.
    Judges are cozy with prosecutors and will let them do whatever they want unless they absolutely cannot justify it.
    Unless it is a first degree or capital felony (or the equivalent in New York), public defenders are expected to get plea deals out of prosecutors rather than vigorously advocate for their clients.

    The system is corrupt to the core. The state of New York needs to pay enough for this that they are motivated to change. Force the city to collect a new tax to pay the damages and something might change.

  2. Our justice system is openly hostile to innocent people. People wait months or even years to get a trial and after many of them have served most or all of their time they are asked if they want a trial. The additional punishment tacked on for asking for a trial is often much longer than the punishment for a crime. One of our most cherished rights, while not technically illegal, is a crime on par with armed robbery or second degree murder.

    Of the innocent people that choose to go to trial many are convicted anyway. It’s not difficult for charities or volunteers to find innocent people in jail. The limiting factor is not the number of innocent convicts it is how many innocent convicts the charity can afford to free.

    While they’re in prison, their families are gouged for every little bit of contact with them. This contact is crucial for keeping them from returning to a life of crime. For many families, they have a choice between maybe keeping their relative sane and having the ability to support them when they get out of prison.

    When innocent people are freed, they are often uncompensated and denied access to the programs for ex-convicts. Many states don’t pay. Many do, but only $50,000, which is rarely even close to a fair amount. That pittance doesn’t come free; those individuals must first sign away their right to sue the state for more reasonable compensation.

    Remember kids, you have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can ONLY be used against you. Anything you say to the police officer that might help your case is heresay. Ask for a lawyer, and before you give into the temptation to put just one sentence out there remember Martha Stewart. She wasn’t convicted of securities fraud. They dropped that charge. She was convicted of four felony charges of maintaining her innocence.

    1. A lawyer friend of mine explained rulings like this. In Wisconsin (and probably in other places), almost every judge in the state has experience as a prosecutor. Something like less than 10% have ever worked as a defense attorney. Still, attorneys sometimes take cases pro bono. Even with this, less than half have ever defended a single client as an occasional pro bono case. This bias of experience means judges will always rule for the prosecutor unless they absolutely cannot do so.

      Why are judges all former prosecutors? Many judge positions are elected, and police unions campaign against public defenders running for a judge position (how is this ethical?). The legislature and governor listen to the attorney general, prosecutors and police attentively in making appointments. They listen to other judges and corrections officers a little. Defense attorneys and probation officers are treated like diseases. He told me how legislators denied to his face actions prosecutors were taking in there cases, even when he had court documents to prove it. They would refuse to look at the documents.

      The system is corrupt to the core.

  3. Interesting article on Hollywood, at first I thought the article was going to be about people in the business but its more about representation on screen. I am wondering if women in the movie business are actualy fighting on two fronts, genuine sexism and the business model i.e. ‘the movie narrative that makes money’.

Leave a Reply

You May Also Enjoy

Close
Close