Quickies

Quickies: Pronouns, hurricanes, and breast milk as health food

Amanda

Amanda is a science grad student in Boston whose favorite pastimes are having friendly debates and running amok.

Related Articles

5 Comments

  1. Best quote from the pronoun story:

    “But then, in the late 18th century, grammarians started recommending that people use he as a gender nonspecific pronoun because they was ostensibly plural, as part of the grand tradition of awkwardly shoehorning English grammar into Latin which has caused many of your present grammatical insecurities, and which I’m totally sure had nothing whatsoever to do with the patriarchy”

  2. The study claiming feminine-named hurricanes are more dangerous has been criticised on methodological grounds. E.g., http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/06/02/why-have-female-hurricanes-killed-more-people-than-male-ones/ . A major problem is that prior to 1979, all hurricanes had female names, and hurricanes also used to be more dangerous due to poorer predictability and mitigation strategies. So there is actually a third variable (year) that explains the correlation. When the author’s tried to correct for this by looking separately at hurricanes after 1979, the effect turned into a non-statistically-significant trend, which earns no points. There are a number of other issues as well, but to me this seems like the key one.

    The idea that implicit sexism could have an effect on people’s responses to threats from natural disasters does seem reasonable to me, but I don’t think this study provides good evidence that such an effect is real.

Leave a Reply

You May Also Enjoy

Close
Close