In “Time Magazine and the Impending Twin-pocalypse,” Deek takes apart one of the most amazingly bad Time articles in the history of crap, “The Problem With America’s Twin Epidemic,” by Sarah Elizabeth Richards.

While reading Deek’s sweet, sweet smackdown, my chart-dar went off, for she presented a perfect example of the quintessential bad chart, followed by a chart that shows the data more accurately. What is interesting is that the bad chart she created was her illustration of the biased and incomplete data in the article rather than a chart from the article itself. To make her point, the Time author, Richards, cited only data from particular years to claim that the twin rate has doubled. Deek created this chart based on Richards’s selective use of data.

Graph1-300x272

Deek then created a chart using all the data for the time period through 2012, the most recently available data from the CDC, showing that the rate is not so steep and is starting to plateau.

Graph2b

Now, whether an increase or decrease is bad or good is another issue that Deek addresses better than I ever could. I’m not going to argue that an infestation of twins won’t bring on the apocalypse, or that you shouldn’t live in terror upon seeing any increase at all. I think we all know from documented sitcom history that an epidemic of twins would result in much duplicitous place switching, especially with the known tendency of a twin to make dates with two different people in the same night. Even non-identical twins have an 83% increased likelihood of being vampires, although vampire nurses are of course more likely to be identical.

Vampire_nurses

But whether or not you are or should be building your twin-proof bunker is beside the point here. If you believe you can survive a pack of twins in the wild, then I wish you the best of luck, my friend.

The point here is that a bad chart not only illustrates how a visual representation can be powerfully convincing of something we already believe to be true but that it can also be used to illustrate the ways in which data are misused in writing, sometimes in ways that aren’t as obvious until you see them in contrasting visual form.

For example, it may or may not terrify you to hear that you are 100 PERCENT likely to DIE after being bitten by a twin, whether fraternal or identical.

Twin bite

You may start thinking you should offer your hand for a twin to sniff before you even think about touching it. (Contrary to urban legend, offering a stick of Doublemint gum will not appease them or keep their mouth busy but will in fact be likely to enrage them.)

But what if we present that startling FACT alongside another?

No twin bite

I think my point is clear. Reach out to a twin today. Even if it bites you, you’re still going to die anyway.

Melanie Mallon

Melanie Mallon

Melanie is a freelance editor and writer who just moved to a small town outside Minneapolis with her husband and two young kids. When not counting how often the words "pride," "liberty," and "freedom" are used in local business, road, and pet names, she spends her time wrangling commas, making colon jokes, and raising her two kids to be critical thinkers. She is the managing editor of Skepchick Events, a Grounded Parents admin, and a Skepchick contributor. You can find her on Twitter as @MelMall, on Facebook, and on Google+

Previous post

Throwback Thursday: Tell Me How I Should Feel

Next post

Quickies: Housework and sex, outrageous rape sentence overturned, and traveling alone as a woman

25 Comments

  1. May 1, 2014 at 4:15 pm —

    Wow, that was jarring. “Even if it bites you?” I had to check the URL to make sure this was really published on Skepchick. You do know that there are real twins out there who can read this post, right?

    • May 1, 2014 at 5:21 pm —

      This entire piece is mocking the original Time article’s dehumanizing of women and of twins (twins compared to disease, an epidemic). Bad Chart Thursday always takes a ridiculous view to extremes in order to mock it.

    • May 2, 2014 at 1:29 pm —

      Yep! I am a real life twin! With a sense of humor! Who knows tongue-in-cheek when she sees it! Your comment is hilarious. Omg.

  2. May 1, 2014 at 5:21 pm —

    I have never been bitten by a twin, and I am not dead. Purple chart refuted. Hah!

  3. May 1, 2014 at 5:24 pm —

    This post is really hurtful and unfair to the 17% of twins who aren’t vampires.

    • May 1, 2014 at 5:32 pm —

      Not to victim blame, but they should really reconsider the lifestyle they’ve chosen. Don’t want to be mistaken for a vampire? Don’t be a twin. It’s that simple, really.

  4. May 1, 2014 at 5:39 pm —

    OK, usually I’m right there with you Melanie but this is beyond the pale.

    If you are bitten by a vampire or even twin vampires, your chances of dying drop to 0% if you are turned. Unless you live next door to Charlie Brewster or something.

    I expected better Skepchick. So sad.

    • May 1, 2014 at 6:01 pm —

      That’s what the vampires want you to think. How would they get so many willing victims if people didn’t believe they could be turned? If people knew vampires were born that way, usually through the evils of IVF treatments, the entire vampire food chain would be in chaos.

      • May 1, 2014 at 9:32 pm —

        LIES!

        PROPAGANDA!!

        Really?

        Please don’t tell me they sparkle too.

        • May 1, 2014 at 10:16 pm —

          Of course not. You’re thinking of triplets.

        • May 1, 2014 at 10:18 pm —

          Also, technically, vampires are dead, so even if you can be turned, you die and are living dead. Kind of Schroedinger’s vampire.

          • May 2, 2014 at 9:30 am

            But they still don’t sparkle, right?

          • May 2, 2014 at 12:08 pm

            No. I’m pretty sure they’re more into jazz hands.

  5. May 1, 2014 at 6:22 pm —

    Love, love, love the last two charts. :)

  6. May 1, 2014 at 7:11 pm —

    I have an identical twin sister. She was the bad twin, and I was the good twin. Now I’m the atheist without kids, and she’s super into Jesus. Haha.

    • May 1, 2014 at 7:12 pm —

      (She’s actually pretty cool and works at a mission/rehab place in Yuma. I would never live in Yuma. Ever. She loves it. We’d make an interest case study, I think…)

      • May 1, 2014 at 10:15 pm —

        I lived in Tucson for 15 years, drove through Yuma once. That was plenty!

        The different paths twins take is really interesting. Atheist and Christian identical twins. OMG, I love it.

    • May 2, 2014 at 12:08 pm —

      I’m a twin, too. I didn’t know it until I was at NECSS a couple of years ago and people kept making very strange remarks to me, about things like how much they liked my blog and stuff. Eventually, I figured out they thought I was PZ Myers*. He was there so I asked him if he needed an evil twin. He said no, he was already his own evil twin, but I could be his good twin if I wanted. He didn’t bite me, though.

      So I want to hijack this thread to be about middle-aged, bearded white men and all the prejudice and discrimination we face because people anti-MABWM’s think we all look alike and confuse us all the time. WE ARE NOT TWINS! WE DEMAND RESPECT AS INDIVIDUALS! WE DEMAND COOKIES!** WE DEMAND THE RIGHT NOT TO BE BITTEN BY EVIL VAMPIRE TWINS!***

      [*] I don’t even think we look that much alike.
      [**] It’s almost lunch time, I’m getting hungry.
      [***] Not that there’s anything wrong with that, if that’s what you’re into.

      • May 2, 2014 at 12:19 pm —

        Now I want a cookie too.

        • May 2, 2014 at 12:21 pm —

          Fine. For my next BCT, I’m going to mock bearded white men in a way that involves cookies.

          IS THAT WHAT YOU TWO REALLY WANT?

          • May 2, 2014 at 3:45 pm

            Yes, please. LOTS of cookies. And mockery too. :)

      • May 2, 2014 at 12:22 pm —

        Now you have to come to SkepchickCon, Buzz, so you and PZ can get up to some twin hijinx.

  7. May 2, 2014 at 4:25 pm —

    Another twin here. I only bite if you ask me nicely. 100% of twins named Steph commenting think that bad chart Thursday rules.

Leave a reply