It’s time once again for Bad Chart Thursday! This week, I was thinking a lot about the old joke that the Super Bowl winner determines whether the stock market will be bullish or bearish (is “bearish” a thing? OK) or that it predicts presidential elections. With that in mind, this week I took things to the next logical step by determining whether or not the Super Bowl winner correlated with the percentage of growth of North Korea’s gross domestic product (GDP). Gaze upon my startling discovery:

North Korea Super Bowl


As you can clearly see, when the AFC team wins the Super Bowl it tends to predict positive growth for the North Korean economy. With the exception of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ unjust win over the Oakland Raiders in 2003, an NFC win predicts negative growth.

What is the AFC hiding, exactly? Who makes all their “Super Bowl Champion” t-shirts? Where are they sending the millions of dollars they probably get (??) for winning the Big Game? I’m just asking questions.

Data comes from this list of Super Bowl winners, which Wikipedia insists on calling “Champions” as though they fought an actual bear or something, and this PDF report on the North Korean economy. Data from 2006 to present was available but inconvenient and so was left out.

Rebecca Watson

Rebecca Watson

Rebecca leads a team of skeptical female activists at and appears on the weekly Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. She travels around the world delivering entertaining talks on science, atheism, feminism, and skepticism. There is currently an asteroid orbiting the sun with her name on it. You can follow her every fascinating move on Twitter or on Google+.

Previous post

AI: Superfluous melee, lexicon lunacy. Retrospective love.

Next post

Skepchick Quickies 2.1


  1. Avatar of bcmystery
    January 31, 2013 at 6:04 pm —

    But they DO fight other deer/man hybrids. Did I get that right?

    • Avatar of criticaldragon1177
      January 31, 2013 at 11:00 pm —


      I’d hate to deal with a man who would use his antlers as a weapon!

      • Avatar of bcmystery
        January 31, 2013 at 11:48 pm —

        There’s no predicting what will happen once they’re overcome by antlerage.

  2. Avatar of daisyduck
    January 31, 2013 at 8:06 pm —

    By “inconvenient” I assume you mean it didn’t match the relationship you were hoping for. ;)

  3. Avatar of nytzschy
    January 31, 2013 at 9:43 pm —

    Clearly, the AFC are secret Communists dedicated to harvesting psychic energy from the United States to aid their beleaguered comrades in Korea? And by putting a question mark at the end of this sentence, I can claim that I am Just Asking Questions?

  4. Avatar of
    January 31, 2013 at 10:45 pm —

    Bad Chart Thursday is the best thing ever.

    • Avatar of jtradke
      February 1, 2013 at 9:15 am —

      I might agree if you could produce a chart that proves it.

  5. Avatar of Walt Milliken
    January 31, 2013 at 11:51 pm —

    Thanks. ROTFL

  6. Avatar of jalyth
    February 1, 2013 at 6:07 am —

    I laughed so hard. I’m picturing you have a large wheel/map with various newsy type items on it and you spin it/throw darts at it to determine which two items to correlate. Is your method a trade secret?

  7. Avatar of Rebecca Watson
    February 1, 2013 at 8:52 am —

    Well it WAS a secret til you came along, blabby mouth!

  8. Avatar of Ubi Dubium
    February 1, 2013 at 11:32 am —

    “Data from 2006 to present was available but inconvenient and so was left out.”
    I am SO stealing this! Brilliant!

    • Avatar of Jack99
      February 2, 2013 at 3:56 am —

      The period 2006-2020 is under investigation.and is the subject of a future publication.
      Further funding is required.

  9. Avatar of 9bar
    February 1, 2013 at 11:52 am —

    “With the exception of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ unjust win over the Oakland Raiders in 2003, an NFC win predicts negative growth.”

    Recent rumor is that the head coach of the Raiders deliberately came up with a bad game plan so that he would lose. I personally don’t buy it but you should totally go with that to explain your anomaly.

  10. Avatar of contemplative1
    February 27, 2014 at 11:06 am —

    Searched for an appropriate story to link this under —

    Shows the stark contrast between DPRK and ROK. Looking at power usage, though, we may be able to give the DPRK some DPRKudos for environmentalism. They use only like 739 kwhrs of power compared to ROK’s 10,000+ kwhrs per capita….. they’re taking their global warming responsibilities seriously!

Add Comment Register

Leave a reply