Skepchick Quickies 7.16



Amanda is a science grad student in Boston whose favorite pastimes are having friendly debates and running amok.

Previous post

AI: The race is on. Or is it?

Next post

Mythbusting Princess Leia's Hair


  1. July 16, 2010 at 9:34 am —

    Anyone else feel the earthquake this morning?

  2. July 16, 2010 at 10:19 am —

    As someone who has had the dread disease, w00t! Kick Malaria’s ass, science!

    But would I be mistaken in thinking breeding malaria-resistant mosquitoes and trying to get them to take over has been done before? For example, from 2007: http://www.pnas.org/content/104/13/5580.abstract

    Maybe it’s the “malaria proof” thing that’s first, as versus “malaria resistant”… though determining that requires some paper-slogging that I’m just not interested in right now.

  3. July 16, 2010 at 10:48 am —

    Malaria-proof mosquitos:

    Initial response: Oh, HELL YEAH! Science is real, bitches!

    More moderate response: These are some very promising results; I hope the malaria-proof mosquitos can thrive in a competitive environment, displacing those that are not.

  4. July 16, 2010 at 10:58 am —
  5. July 16, 2010 at 11:14 am —

    NPR covered the binaural beats silliness too. Thankfully their treatment was quite skeptical: NPR : Researcher Dispels Notion Music Can Get Kids High

  6. July 16, 2010 at 11:37 am —

    @QuestionAuthority: I live about 20miles from the epicenter and I usually wake up at least 3 or 4 times a night, but I didn’t feel a thing this morning. Earthquakes only like to hit when I’m sleeping soundly I guess.

    @marilove: Hahaha! I guess they really were serious when they said they didn’t want to talk to no scientists.

  7. July 16, 2010 at 1:53 pm —

    Cute panda is cute.

  8. July 16, 2010 at 2:30 pm —

    Good idea: Malaria-proof mosquitoes.

    Better idea: Mosquitoes that don’t bite peopl– *ouch get off me you itchy little buggers*

  9. July 18, 2010 at 12:06 am —

    Malaria-proof mosquitoes have been around for a while. I used to raise them for a lab. They were Anopheles gambiae, one of the main vectors. They weren’t genetically engineered, but selectively bred from wild populations.

    The problem is that it is difficult to select for mosquitoes that block the transfer of malaria. There is usually little difference in the fecundity and life span of the female mosquitoes that are infected with malaria and those that aren’t. So there is no benefit to the mosquitoes not to vector the disease. Also the mechanism that prevents the transfer is an immune response, which uses resources that could have been used to produce more eggs. So there is a slight disadvantage to the mosquito. Considering that there are naturally resistant populations of the mosquitos, and none of these populations have displaced vector populations, I have my doubts that this could be done.

  10. July 18, 2010 at 11:36 am —

    Even though it was, in reality, mostly parlour tricks when it wasn’t just plain old made up bullshit, I’m still pretty interested in the guy who’s trying to recreate middle ages alchemy. I doubt he’ll discover anything ground-breaking, but then again we did, as a civilisation, forget how to make concrete for a millennium or so, so who knows what he’ll find. ;P

    That is, assuming he can actually decode the ciphers all the alchemists wrote in. Each of them was an amateur cryptologist, and they all used their own idiosyncratic ciphers, so even though they didn’t have the kind of advanced cryptography we do now, the ciphers are still pretty hard to crack.

Leave a reply