Religion

Bertrand Russell on God

Happy new year, heathens! Stay safe tonight.

“Religious people, most of them, think that it’s a virtuous act to tell lies about the deathbeds of agnostics and such.”

Tags

Rebecca Watson

Rebecca leads a team of skeptical female activists at Skepchick.org. She travels around the world delivering entertaining talks on science, atheism, feminism, and skepticism. There is currently an asteroid orbiting the sun with her name on it. You can follow her every fascinating move on Twitter or on Google+.

Related Articles

7 Comments

  1. Interviewer: “The Ordinary person … has to have something imposed upon them from outside.”

    Russell: “What’s imposed on you from outside is of no value, whatever. …”
    ————–

    Except that your parents “impose upon you from the outside.” Also the morals themselves may be valid, despite their origins. Yes that means a rational basis for the morals you keep, and discard the ‘immoral morals.’

  2. @jsg: I took it to mean (and I realize I may be reading a bit into Mr. Russell’s words hear a bit) that things that are only imposed form the outside are valueless. For example, religious (and secular) law says that it’s wrong to murder.* In reality, though, the reason the majority of people don’t go around murdering is because they themselves believe that it’s wrong. If someone personally believes that murdering people is A-OK, then a rule that is purely imposed from the outside is unlikely to do much good.

    *Yes, I realize that the relationship between religion and murder is more complicated than this, but for the moment let’s assume that when the Judeo-Christian god said “thous shalt not kill” he meant… “thou shalt not kill.”

  3. Either it is true or it isn’t, and if you don’t know suspend judgment. I agree but that doesn’t fly when practical action is necessary. For instance I suspect that there is no such thing as free will, it is just that causation and determinism is far too complicated and varied to make solid decisions based on that paradigm. One can suspend judgment on the debate and still act as if the proposition is true. Believing does nothing for action. Now this may sound like pleading Pascal’s wager but it isn’t, because his argument assumes too much information to make a good decision and to act as if. The free will vs. determinism debate is far more cut and dry and the decision to act as if free will existed, regardless of belief, has far more of an upside then a down.

    Just a long winded tangent to what Berty said. Good clip and happy new year.

Leave a Reply

You May Also Enjoy

Close
Close